Editorial

 

Importance and significance of studying people with joint hypermobility.

 

 

To have Hypermobility (HM) without symptoms is a good quality, but if there are symptoms then we are dealing with a disease, called Joint Hypermobility Syndrome (JHS). The real incidence of HM is difficult to establish, since it varies with age, sex and race, being higher in children, women and oriental races. In general it is estimated that, in occidental countries, it affects between 10 and 15% of the population (using the Beighton score).

 

JHS is extremely frequent in Chile and in other Latin countries, but usually it is not diagnosed. We agree with Grahame, who is the maximal authority in the subject, that JHS is probably the most frequent cause of pain in the rheumatological practice. The Beighton score is helpful to give an idea about joint hypermobility, but it is insufficient for the diagnosis of JHS. The Brighton criteria, validated by Grahame (1998), have come to facilitate this diagnosis. Recently using this criterion systematically, it has been found that JHS affects 45% of patients in a Rheumatological Clinic in London and even at a higher percentage in Santiago, Chile. Our unusual high frequency of 80% is explained by the high frequency of JHS in the Chilean population (39%), and the fact that our clinic is a referral center for these patients.

 

It is necessary to be able to differentiate the different types of Hereditary Diseases of the Collagen Fiber, since the possible complications vary from one disease to another. It is well known that in Marfan syndrome there can be dilation or rupture of the aortic artery, spontaneous pneumothorax and osteoporosis. The spontaneous pneumothorax can also be seen in the Marfanoid type of JHS and in the Vascular Ehlers-Danlos (VEDS). In Osteogenesis Imperfecta the principal problem are multiples fractures, since childhood.  We rheumatologists are more interested in the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes, since there are more frequent in our clinics than what it is usually thought. If in Chile JHS exists in 39% of the population and if JHS musculo-skeletal pain is the principal cause of pain in rheumatology, then it is probable that in our clinics at least 50% of the patients have JHS alone or associated to an arthritis. In 15% of our 1,200 JHS patients, an associated arthritis was found. JHS is for most authors the same as the formerly called Ehlers-Danlos type III. For some time it was called Benign JHS, in relation to the VEDS, that has worse prognosis. Really JHS is not benign, since it can cause poor quality of life, important complications and even it can be disabling. Besides musculo-skeletal pain it is important to study the BMD in all patients with JHS, since we have found that 19% of males and females, younger than 30 years of age have Osteoporosis. In this same age group we found Dysautonomia (chronic fatigue, dizziness and at times syncope) in 40% of males and 64% of females. It is important to note that Dysautonomia, that can cause very poor quality of life, responds very well to treatment.

 

Frequently we see JHS patients with arthralgias who have had the wrong diagnosis of SLE, RA or Psoriatic Arthritis without psoriasis, because of borderline laboratory results.  In patients with back pain, enthesitis, costocondritis and positive Brighton criteria, the differential diagnosis between JHS and Pelvispondyloarthropaties can be difficult. It is necessary to remember that Xerostomia and Xerophthalmia, are not only seen in Sjögren, but also in JHS, due to the alteration of the autonomous nervous system, that usually exists in these patients. Acrocianosis, that is frequent in JHS, due to peripheral vascular alteration, is usually confused with Raynaud´s phenomenon, which existed only in 2% of our patients. There are many patients diagnosed as Fibromyalgia, that really are JHS, since both diseases can have arthralgias, myalgias, painful points or enthesitis, back pain, irritable colon, gastric reflux, chronic fatigue and normal laboratory tests.

 

We have dedicated a special article to Vascular EDS (VEDS), in this number of the journal, since it is imperative to have the diagnosis before a serious complication arises, which could be fatal. Knowing the diagnosis in advance can save the patients life. VEDS is less frequent, but more serious than JHS. Since it also has Autosomal Dominant Inheritance, this diagnosis should be suspected if there is a family member that has VEDS. It is important to know that the serious arterial complications, at times fatal, happen 25% of them before age 20 and 80% of them before the age of 40. It is also important to remember that VEDS patients do not have significant joint hypermobility and if a person has marked joint hypermobility most likely does not have VEDS.

 

There is a tremendous lack of knowledge about the importance of Joint Hypermobility. For most physicians and general public, it is a curiosity or a kind of  “party tricks” or “a circus act” and not a potentially serious medical problem. Already in the year 2001, Grahame wrote an editorial entitled ”It is time to take joint hypermobility seriously” and that same year in the study of the rheumatologists in England, he noted that the great majority of them did not know this syndrome. The Arthritis & Rheumatism journal has published only one article on Joint Hypermobility, situation that indicates that JHS is also underestimated in USA.

 

The reason for this international lack of interest is multiple: patients are diagnosed as having local problems as tendinitis, bursitis, subluxations, without realizing that they are suffering a more complex condition called JHS. If it is noted that the patient has joint hypermobility, no attention is given to its significance, or to possible complications. The very high frequency of joint hypermobility, the lack of knowledge that it is related to damage of multiple organs, besides that the clinical picture is not dramatic, that there are no inflammatory signs and that there are no abnormal laboratory tests, neither typical X-ray changes and that there is a sensation that the treatment is ineffective, makes physicians not interested in diagnosing these conditions.  Rheumatologists as well as medical students have had no training in how to examine the hypermobility patient and the majority of rheumatologists do not know or they do not use the diagnostic criteria that permit the recognition of these patients. The fact that we have printed sheets with the Brighton criteria for JHS and the Villefranche criteria for the diagnosis of VEDS and that we use them to see if patients fulfill these criteria, has facilitated us the diagnosis of this pathology.

 

We believe that an increase in medical and public knowledge of these diseases will facilitate diagnosis, will give better quality of life to the patients, and will improve prevention and early treatment of Osteoporosis, Osteoarthritis, Dysautonomia and severe complications such as ruptures of arteries and organs.

 

 

 

Jaime F. Bravo, MD

Departments of Rheumatology

San Juan de Dios Hospital and Clinica Arauco Salud.. Santiago. Chile

jaime.bravos@gmail.com

www.reumatologia-dr-bravo.cl

 

Revista chilena de Reumatologia 2008;24(1):4-5.